التحليلات المكانية لتخطيط التعليم والنقل المدرسي
Two use-case portfolios on one engine and one national geography: Ministry of Education planning across seven analyses, and Rafed school transportation built to the approved planning rules.
Capacity against student demand per stage and gender, with new-school, expansion, relocation and consolidation actions.
Travel time and distance to the assigned school for students and staff, and the avoidable travel a reassignment would remove.
Benchmark-relative results across NAFS, PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and Tarteeb, with Getis-Ord Gi* performance clusters.
Shortages and surpluses per school and specialization against the establishment table, with redistribution options.
Where transfer demand concentrates, and whether approving it closes a real staffing gap or creates a surplus.
Programme demand located at the applicant’s home region against the seats that actually exist there.
Employment rate, time to employment, field alignment and regional talent retention by programme.
Rule-compatible student grouping, route design within the approved planning rules, bus sizing, and a like-for-like comparison against the network in operation today.
Every approved planning rule is carried in the product, including the road-network rules this deployment does not evaluate. A route awaiting a manual check is labelled as such — never reported as compliant.
Seat adequacy runs separately for each stage and gender, then weights up. An aggregate figure would net a girls’ surplus against a boys’ deficit in the same district and call it adequate.
NAFS, PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and Tarteeb sit on different scales, so results are normalised to a gap against their own benchmark before any district average is taken.
Workforce shortage is measured against the ministry’s required-vs-assigned table, not inferred from enrollment. Where no record exists, the derived requirement is marked as derived.
Distances are straight-line with a 1.3 detour factor unless a routing engine is configured, and every response says which was used. A proxy reported as a proxy is usable; one reported as a measurement is not.